top of page


Federal Judge Rules in Favor of Trump's Election Order Amid USPS Mail Ballot Rule Changes
A
Opponents, including voting rights groups and Democratic organizations, argue that election administration is primarily the responsibility of states and Congress and contend that portions of the order exceed presidential authority. Supporters argue the reforms would improve voter roll accuracy, reduce the risk of duplicate registrations, and strengthen confidence in election outcomes.


A Defining Election Law Case Heads to the Supreme Court This Week
WASHINGTON, D.C. The Supreme Court of the United States will hear arguments Monday in a case that goes to the core of modern election administration: when is a ballot officially counted?
In Watson v. RNC, the justices will decide whether states may count mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day, so long as they are postmarked on or before that day.
A simple question with sweeping national consequences.


Trump Appointed Ninth Circuit Judge’s Dissent Fuels Supreme Court Showdown Over California Prop 50
A federal three-judge panel this week upheld California’s Proposition 50, clearing the way for the state to use newly drawn congressional maps in the 2026 election cycle. But a sharp dissent from a Trump-appointed judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has now put the case on a potential collision course with the U.S. Supreme Court.


Trump-Appointed Judges Drive Ninth Circuit Ruling Striking Down California Open-Carry Ban
A divided Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has delivered one of the most significant Second Amendment rulings in recent California history, striking down the state’s long-standing ban on open carry in most populated counties.


Can Your Dog Be a Tax Dependent? One New York Lawsuit Puts the IRS on the Leash
New York attorney has filed a federal lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service, arguing that her pet dog should qualify as a tax dependent under federal law.


Wisconsin Judge Convicted on Federal Obstruction Charges: Why the Rule of Law Still Matters
A Wisconsin circuit court judge’s federal obstruction conviction isn’t a policy debate—it’s a rule-of-law test. Here’s why the verdict matters for public trust in the judiciary.
bottom of page
